Dismissed¶27

Prof. (Dr) E.Ilamathian, v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

Madras HC21 Nov 2025WP/38854/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Abatement of writ petition on petitioner's death; dismissal as abated with no costs; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; Order No.E/1905/15 dated 1/2/2016; Tamil Nadu Institute of Labour Studies; pensionable service; Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978; cause does not survive; petitioner deceased; High Court of Judicature at Madras; K. Surender, J.; 21/11/2025; W.P.No.38854 of 2016.

What did the court decide?

Recording the learned Government Advocate's submission that the petitioner is no more and hence the cause does not survive in the writ petition, the writ petition is dismissed as abated, with no costs. The underlying claim regarding pensionable service was not adjudicated. ¶27

Prof. (Dr) E.Ilamathian, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.38854 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21/11/2025

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶5

Writ Petition No.38854 of 2016

¶6

Prof (Dr) E.Ilamathian … Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The State of Tamil Nadu

¶9

rep. By

¶10

The Principal Secretary to Government Labour and Employment Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.

¶11

The Commissioner of Labour DMS Complex Chennai 600 006.

¶12

The Director

¶13

Tamil Nadu Institute of Labour Studies No.5 Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane Chennai 600 005. …

¶14

Respondents

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.38854 of 2016

¶18

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondents relating to the order in No.E/1905/15 dated 1/2/2016 passed by the third respondent and to quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to treat the entire services of the petitioner rendered in the Tamil Nadu Institute of Labour Studies, Chennai 5, as pensionable service and pay pension and other benefits as provided under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

¶19

For petitioner ... Mr.S.Saravana Prakash No appearance For respondents ... Mr.R.Neethi Perumal Government Advocate for R.R.1 and 2

¶20

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Today, when the matter is taken taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner is no more and hence, cause does not survive in the writ petition.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.38854 of 2016

¶26