Dismissed

D.Sreeraj v. the Commissioner

Madras HC7 Oct 2025WP/37742/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought removal of locks and seals from the disputed property and handover of possession. Upon the petitioner's counsel seeking withdrawal and making an endorsement to that effect, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to move the executing court.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to move executing court.

D.Sreeraj Vs the Commissioner — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07-10-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶7

D.Sreeraj S/o.Late P.V. Dhamodharan, No.175, 2nd Street, nion Carbide Colony, Kodungaiyur, Chennai- 600 118.

¶8

Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The Commissioner The Revenue Department (N035) Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, 1st Floor, Raja Muthiah Road, Kannappar Thidal, Periyamet, Chennai- 600 003. 2.S.Loganathan

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶14

PRAYER

¶15

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶16

India directing the 1st respondent to remove the lock and seal of the schedule

¶17

property at 13, Ethirajsamy Salai, Erukkencherry, Chennai- 600 118 in

¶18

accordance with law and simultaneously hand over the possession of the property to the petitioner being the landlord of the property within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble court.

¶19

For Petitioner Mr. K.Subhashini

¶20

for M/s.Chennai Law Associates

¶21

For Respondent: Ms.Lavanya for Mr.E.C.Ramesh, for R1

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to

¶24

withdraw the writ petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect on

¶25

the bundle.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶28

Considering the Submission and the endorsement made by the learned

¶29

counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without

¶30

prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the executing court to take delivery pursuant to the order passed in O.S.No.7509 of 2025 on the file of the

¶31

XX Additional District Court, City Civil Court, Allikulam, Chennai.

¶32

07-10-2025

¶33

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

mrp

1.The Commissioner

The Revenue Department (N035) Greater Chennai Corporation Ripon Building, 1st Floor, Raja Muthiah Road, Kannappar Thidal, Periyamet, Chennai- 600 003.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶40

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

¶41

mrp

¶42

WP No. 37742 of 2025

¶43

07-10-2025

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Sreeraj v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sreeraj v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santhanam Vs Ramasamy (Died)

M.Ramasamy Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Ramasamy Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

P.Soundarapandian Vs the Commissioner

M/S. 9LALITHA Transport Vs Transport Commissioner

S.Boobalakrishnan Vs the Director