Bharathi Agro Traders v. The State Tax Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition (Art. 226 certiorari); GST assessment order (FORM GST DRC-07, Ref. ZD330225126721T dated 13.02.2025) for GSTIN/33AIYPP5500A1ZF/2020-21, Tax Period 2020-2021; preceded by Show Cause Notice GST DRC-01 dated 26.11.2024; personal hearing missed; Section 107 GST appeal limitation expired; conditional quashing and remand for fresh assessment; 25% pre-deposit of disputed tax in cash from Electronic Cash Register within 30 days; reply to DRC-01 within 30 days treating order as addendum; fresh orders within 3 months after hearing; non-compliance permits tax recovery as if dismissed in limine; parties: Bharathi Agro Traders (P Periyasamy) v. State Tax Officer, Attur Town Circle, Salem; counsel: Siri Chandana.K (petitioner), V.Prashanth Kiran (Government Advocate); judge: C.Saravanan.
What did the court decide?
Impugned Assessment Order dated 13.02.2025 quashed and matter remitted to the Respondent for a fresh order, conditional on the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash within 30 days and filing a reply to the DRC-01 Show Cause Notice within 30 days; fresh orders to be passed preferably within 3 months after hearing; on non-compliance, the Respondent may recover the tax as if the writ petition was dismissed in limine. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.