M.Balachander v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC WP No. 33357 of 2025, disposed 03-09-2025 (A.D. Jagadish Chandira J.): writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus on family pension records in PPO No. R0435293 - inclusion of petitioner's second wife Ambika, D/o. Pangaru, and removal of Padmavathy's name; Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore (R1) had considered the 15.04.2025 representation and replied on 14.05.2025 via Na.Ka.No.J1/E.1031698/2025 seeking particulars not yet furnished by petitioner; petition disposed of with liberty to furnish documents and proceed in accordance with law; no costs. Counsel: E. Parthiban, N. Velmurugan, K. Balachander, S. Muthumani (petitioner); R.U. Dinesh Raj Kumar, AGP (R1); A.N.R. Jayaprathap, Standing Counsel (R2).
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to furnish the outstanding documents sought by the first respondent and to proceed further in accordance with law; no substantive direction on the family-pension entries; no costs awarded.