Dismissed¶28

K.Raj v. The District Collector

Madras HC18 Nov 2025WP/33311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

K.Raj vs The District Collector, Erode and others; W.P.No.33311 of 2022; Madras High Court; decision dated 18.11.2025; Coram M.S. Ramesh J. and R. Sakthivel J.; community certificate; Hindu-Chakkiliyar (SC); Revenue Divisional Officer Gopichettipalayam; Revenue Tahsildar Bhavani; Revenue Inspector Bhavani; Na.Ka.10786/2022/K3; impugned order dated 27.05.2022; writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; listed for withdrawal; counsel's endorsement in court bundle; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw acceded to; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs. No relief on the merits of the Community Certificate claim. ¶28

K.Raj Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.33311 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.11.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

W.P.No.33311 of 2022

K.Raj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Erode – 638 001.

¶12

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gopichettipalayam.

¶13

3.The Revenue Tahsildar, Bhavani.

¶14

4.The Revenue Inspector, Bhavani. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 27.05.2022 passed in Na.Ka.10786/2022/K3 by the respondent No.1 herein, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue the Community Certificate of Hindu-Chakkiliyar (SC).

¶16

Page 1 of 5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.33311 of 2022

¶19

F or Petitioner : Mr.P.Vetrivel

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.G.Ameedius, Government Advocate

¶21

ORDER