Dismissed¶32

D.Senthil Kumar v. State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC20 Aug 2025WP/33191/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court dismissed WP 33191/2013 (D. Senthil Kumar v State of Tamil Nadu; Director of School Education; Teachers Recruitment Board) for non-prosecution on 20-08-2025 (Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J.). Petition under Article 226 sought quashing of TRB order dated 23.10.2013 (C.V. No.11142, Board No. B.21) on petitioner's ineligibility for P.G. Assistant (Commerce), visually impaired category (Roll No.13PG14110437). Connected W.M.P.No.1 of 2013 closed; no costs; no merits decision; petitioner unrepresented ('No appearance'). Advocates: Ayyadurai, Government Advocate (R1, R2); C.Kathiravan (R3).

What did the court decide?

None. Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs awarded; connected Miscellaneous Petition (W.M.P.No.1 of 2013) closed consequentially. ¶32

D.Senthil Kumar Vs State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 33191 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20-08-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

WP No. 33191 of 2013 and

¶7

W.M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶8

D.Senthil Kumar S/o.Late M. Duraisamy, No.146/88 Mettu Street, Senthamangalam Post, Namakkal District 637 409.

¶9

Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶12

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶13

3.The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, E.V.K. Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No. 33191 of 2013

¶17

Respondent(s)

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 23.10.2013 in C.V. No.11142 in Board No. B.21, passed by the 3rd respondent in respect of petitioner's (Roll No.13PG14110437) ineligibility for selection for the post of P.G. Assistant under VISUALLY IMPAIRED CATEGORY UNDER Commerce subject and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider his appointment for the said post.

¶19

For Petitioner(s): No appearance

¶20

For Respondent(s): Mr.Ayyadurai, Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.C.Kathiravan for R3

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This matter came up for consideration before this Court on 19.08.2025.

¶23

As there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be

¶24

listed under the caption “For dismissal”.