The Management of v. P.Jayakumar

Madras HC19 Jun 2025WP/32868/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Certiorari writ petition (Art. 226, Madras High Court) challenging Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore award C.P.No.40 of 2021 dated 04.07.2023; underlying dispute I.D.No.155 of 2017 pending challenge in W.P.No.25479 of 2022; Labour Court had computed the amount; petition closed 19.06.2025 (P. Dhanabal, J.) with execution permitted subject to result of W.P.No.25479 of 2022; no costs; connected W.M.P.No.32504 of 2023 closed; parties: Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd. v. P.Jayakumar; advocate: T.Chandrasekaran.

What did the court decide?

No relief in substance; writ petition closed with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P.No.32504 of 2023) also closed; execution of the C.P.No.40 of 2021 order permitted subject to the result of W.P.No.25479 of 2022 ¶¶26

The Management of Vs P.Jayakumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.32868 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

¶6

W.P.No.32868 of 2023 And W.M.P.No.32504 of 2023

¶7

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Kovai Region Corporate Office No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 641 043. ... Petitioner

Vs.

P.Jayakumar

... Respondent

Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to

¶13

issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the award made in C.P.No.40 of 2021 dated 04.07.2023 on the file of the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore, and quash the same.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran For Respondent : Notice Served – No Appearance

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.32868 of 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed in C.P.No.40 of 2021 dated 04.07.2023 on the file of the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this writ petition is filed challenging the order passed in C.P.No.40 of 2021. The main I.D.No.155 of 2017 itself is under challenge through W.P.No.25479 of 2022. Therefore the computed amount cannot be disbursed.

¶21

3.There is no representation for the respondent.

¶22

4.Since the main I.D.No.155 of 2017 is under challenge through W.P.No.25479 of 2022, now the Labour Court also computed the amount, it is appropriate to close this writ petition by observing that the order passed in C.P.No.40 of 2021 can be executed subject to the result of W.P.No.25479 of 2022.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.32868 of 2023

¶26