Disposed¶22

K.Rama Rao v. Indian Overseas Bank

Madras HC18 Aug 2025WP/3242/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.3242 of 2019; K. Rama Rao v. Indian Overseas Bank; Chief Manager / Disciplinary Authority, Valmiki Nagar Branch; Article 226; writ of certiorarified mandamus; impugned order dated 19.01.2019; W.P. No.14401 of 2017 (order dated 21.06.2017); infructuous; writ petition closed; no costs; T. Vinod Kumar, J.; decided 18.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the writ petition was closed as infructuous with no costs awarded. ¶22

K.Rama Rao Vs Indian Overseas Bank — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.3242 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.08.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.3242 of 2019

K.Rama Rao

Petitioner

1 Indian Overseas Bank, Rep by its Chief Executive Officer/MD in charge, Central Office, 763, Anna salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶11

2 The Chief Manager / Disciplinary Authority, Indian Overseas Bank, Valmiki Nagar Branch, Region : Chennai II. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent and to quash the impugned order, dated 19.01.2019, as it is against the well settled proposition of law laid by the Honourable Court in W.P. No.14401 of 2017, vide order dated 21.06.2017.

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.3242 of 2019

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthikeyan

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy, Senior Panel Counsel.

¶18

ORDER