Dismissed¶43

R.Chellammal v. the District Collector

Madras HC17 Oct 2025WP/31895/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 17-10-2025 in WP No. 31895 of 2025 (with WMP No. 35706 of 2025), Krishnan Ramasamy J.: Article 226 writ of declaration challenging registered document Doc.No.1138/2017 dated 22.09.2017 (Sub Registrar, Kodumudi) obtained, as alleged, through a fraudulent legal heir certificate suppressing other legal heirs of Karuppanna Gounder; petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request with liberty to approach the Civil Court; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no cases cited, no merits decided; relevant only as an instance of withdrawal-with-liberty practice.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Civil Court; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (WMP No. 35706 of 2025) closed. ¶43

R.Chellammal Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 31895 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17-10-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

WP No. 31895 of 2025 AND

¶7

WMP NO. 35706 OF 2025

¶8

R.Chellammal, W/o Rathinam, No.2, Maravapalayam, Noyyal Vettamangalam Vettamangalam (West) Noyyal, Karur 639 117.

¶9

Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

1.The District Collector, Office of The District Registrar Office, Rangampalayam, Erode District, Erode.

¶12

2.The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode.

¶13

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perunthurai Sub Division, Erode District.

¶14

4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar Office, Kodumudi, Erode District 638 151.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No. 31895 of 2025

¶17

5.The Inspector of Police, Kodumudi Police Station, Erode District.

¶18

6.The Tahsildar, Karur Taluk, Now at Pugalur Taluk, Karur District.

¶19

7.Sampooranam, W/o Late Krishnasamy, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶20

8.S.Ramadevi, S/o Late Santhakumar, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶21

9.S.Monika, D/o Late Santhakumar, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶22

10.Minor S. Subika,

¶23

D/o Late Santhakumar, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶24

11.Minor S. Hemandhkumar,

¶25

S/o Late Santhakumar, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WP No. 31895 of 2025

¶28

12.V.Gomathi, W/o Vivekanadhan, 2/66, Kaspa Dumbivadi, Dumbivadi Village, Aravukurichi Taluk, Karur District.

¶29

13.Kanagaraj, S/o Late Krishnasamy, Kulathupalayam, Vettamangalam Post, Karuru District 639 117.

¶30

14.M.Rajendran, S/o Marappa Gounder, 118 Anna Nagar, Kurukkusalai, Noiyal, Vettamangalam West, Karur 639 117.

¶31

15.M.Sanmugam, S/o Marappa Gounder, 46, North Street, Periyavattam, Chinnasmudiram Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District 638 151.

¶32

16.N.Tamilselvi, W/o R. Nagarajan, No.5 Sri Ramperu Illam, CHB Colony West, Paramathi Vellore Road, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal District 637 211.

¶33

Respondent(s)

¶34

PRAYER: -Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring the Doc.No.1138 / 2017 on the file of the 4th respondent office dated 22.09.2017 in favour of the 4th

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

WP No. 31895 of 2025

¶37

respondent office dated 22.09.2017 in favour of the 7th respondent is null and void based on the fraudulent legal heir certificate and suppressing the other legal heirs of the said Karuppanna Gounder.

¶38

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K. Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate For R1, R4, R6. Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2, R3 & R5 Ms.H.Priyanka for Mr.M.Venkadeshan for R7 to R13 No Appearance for R16

¶39

ORDER

¶40

When the matter came up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with

¶41

liberty to approach the Civil Court and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶42

2.Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶43

counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis