Dismissed¶33

M.Prabhu Kumar v. the District Collector

Madras HC28 Aug 2025WP/31322/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras HC, W.P.No.31322 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.35045 of 2025, 28.08.2025, Mohammed Shaffiq J. Mandamus sought under Article 226 against District Collector/RDO/Tahsildar (Anaicut, Vellore District) to act on petitioners' representation dated 16.12.2024; private respondents 4-8. Counsel withdrew the petition with endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; connected MP closed. Withdrawal-only disposal — no ruling on merits, nothing citable.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and the connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. ¶33

M.Prabhu Kumar Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.31322 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 28.08.2025

¶4

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶5

W.P.No.31322 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.35045 of 2025

1.M.Prabhu Kumar

2.M.Sudhesh Kumar

3.M.Preman

4.M.Praveen

5.M.Pradeep

...Petitioners

Versus

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶14

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶15

3.The Tahsildar, Anaicut, Anaicut Taluk, Vellore District.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.31322 of 2025

...Respondents

4.Chinnaiyan

5.Perumal

6.Thangamuthu

7.Chinnadurai

8.Mohan

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on the petitioners' Representation dated 16.12.2024.

¶26

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar For Respondents – 1 to 3 : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government Pleader

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned

¶29

counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.

¶30

2/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.31322 of 2025

¶33

2. Considering the request coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

28.08.2025

mrr

Index : Yes/No