Dismissed¶21

T.D.Naidu v. the Additional Superintendent of Police

Madras HC18 Mar 2025WP/31227/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.No.31227 of 2024; Madras High Court; M. Nirmal Kumar, J.; 18.03.2025; T.D.Naidu v. Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI Bank Securities and Fraud Cell, Bangalore; Article 226; writ of mandamus; withdrawal of final reports; Spl.C.C.No.3 of 2020; C.C.No.1 of 2020; Crime No.RC.3(E)/2012; RC.12(E)/2016; XI Additional Judge, Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai; dismissed as withdrawn; endorsement by counsel; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without any adjudication on merits. ¶21

T.D.Naidu Vs the Additional Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.31227 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.03.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.31227 of 2024

¶7

T.D.Naidu ... Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities and Fraud Cell,

¶10

Bangalore.

¶11

Crime No.RC.3(E)/2012

¶12

2.The State Represented by Inspector of Police, CBI-BS & FC, Bangalore. RC.12(E)/2016. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to withdraw the final reports filed in Spl.C.C.No.3 of 2020 and C.C.No.1 of 2020 pending trial on the file of the learned XI Additional Judge, Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai and to file a single final report.

¶14

For Petitioner : Ms.A.L.Gandhimathi, Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Viswanathan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI)

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No.1 of 4

¶19

W.P.No.31227 of 2024

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.

¶21

2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶22

18.03.2025 (2/2)

¶23

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rsi

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Page No.2 of 4

¶26

W.P.No.31227 of 2024