K. Maheswaran v. The District Manager / Deputy
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; WP.No.3058 of 2018; decided 03.02.2025; Justice R.N. Manjula (single judge). Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by K. Maheswaran (suspended Salesman, TASMAC Shop No.2477, Gangaikondan Retail Shop, Neyveli-II, Cuddalore District) against the District Manager / Deputy Collector, Tasmac Limited, Cuddalore District, seeking quashing of Proceedings Se Mu No. Rv1/3081/2477/2017 dated 06.01.2017 and reinstatement with consequential benefits. Dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that subsequent orders had been passed; no costs. Advocates: Mr.M.Ravi for petitioner; Mr.P.Anandakumarn, G.A. for respondent. No precedents cited; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Recording the petitioner's counsel's submission that subsequent orders had been passed rendering the prayer infructuous, this Court held that nothing survived for adjudication and dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no costs.