Dismissed¶¶21

E.Kuppan v. the Second Appellant Authority

Madras HC14 Aug 2025WP/30263/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, W.P.No.30263 of 2025, E. Kuppan v. Second Appellate Authority, Pondicherry Municipality & Ors., Coram: N. Mala, J.; order dated 14.08.2025; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the second Appellate Authority/Central Information Commission; prayer for mandamus to furnish information sought via application dated 09.11.2024 and appeals dated 13.12.2024, 06.02.2025; Article 226; no costs; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the second Appellate Authority/Central Information Commission; no costs. ¶¶21

E.Kuppan Vs the Second Appellant Authority — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.30263 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.08.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

Writ Petition No.30263 of 2025

E.Kuppan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Second Appellate Authority, The Commissioner, Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry – 605 001.

¶11

The First Appellate Authority, The Commissioner, Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry – 605 001.

¶12

The Public Information Office

¶13

-cum- Revenue Officer – II, Revenue Officer – II, Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry – 605 001. … Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to furnish the information sought by the petitioner through the application dated 09.11.2024 and appeals dated 13.12.2024, 06.02.2025 and take appropriate action against the respondents for not furnishing the information sought by the petitioner through application and appeals.

¶15

Page No.1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.U.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate

¶18

W.P.No.30263 of 2025

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶21

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the second Appellate Authority/Central Information Commission. No costs.

¶22

14.08.2025

¶23

dh Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶24

To:

¶25