K.Sathish v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: water body protection and preservation; removal of encroachment from water channel; government canal porampoke land; mandamus under Article 226; PIL Madras High Court; Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act 1905; Tahsildar status report; Block Development Officer Form-1 notice dated 15.09.2025; 12 encroachments Survey No.145/1 and 145/2 Kanisapakkam Village Panruti Taluk Cuddalore; free house site patta; revenue standing orders; eviction shall not be deferred pending allotment; peace committee meeting; petitioner's own encroachment also removable. Useful for arguments on eviction from water bodies where alternative allotment is pending, and on the duty of revenue authorities to restore encroached water bodies.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions to the authorities to restore the water body in Survey Nos.145/1 and 145/2 of Kanisapakkam Village and make it free from encroachment; eviction not to be deferred pending allotment proceedings; eligible encroachers may be allotted suitable land under the revenue standing orders; any encroachment by the petitioner likewise removable; no order as to costs.