Jainaf Vs the Director General of Police

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.11.2024 and direct the respondents to transfer the petitioner's husband, Mr.Umar Faaruq alias Srinivasan, S/o.T.Kasi, aged 40 years, remand prisoner, now confined in the Central prison, Vellore, to the central prison, Salem.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 6

¶16

W.P.No.2767 of 2025

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi

¶18

For Respondent

¶19

: Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶20

ORDER

¶21

M.S.RAMESH, J. and

¶22

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

¶23

This Writ Petition has been filed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.11.2024 and direct the respondents to transfer the petitioner's husband, Mr.Umar Faaruq alias Srinivasan, S/o.T.Kasi, aged 40 years, remand prisoner, now confined in the Central prison, Vellore, to the central prison, Salem.

¶24

2. The petitioner states that her husband was arrested in connection with RC.No.01/2022/NIA/CHE under Section 174 Cr.P.C., and 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act and remanded to judicial custody at Special Court for NIA Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai and he was detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore. Thereafter, he was transferred to Central Prison, Vellore. Since the petitioner with her school going children finds it difficult travelling from Tiruppur to Vellore, she made a representation dated 19.11.2024 before the respondents seeking to transfer the

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Page 2 of 6

¶27

W.P.No.2767 of 2025

¶28

petitioner's husband from Central Prison, Vellore to Central Prison, Salem. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition.

¶29

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶30

4. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶31

5. In view of the above observation, this Court, without going into the merits of the petitioner's representation or the contentions of the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 6

¶33

W.P.No.2767 of 2025

¶34

19.11.2024, seeking to transfer the petitioner's husband from Central Prison, Vellore to Central Prison, Salem, if not already disposed of and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner.

¶35

6 . With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶36

No costs.

¶37

[M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] 26.02.2025

¶38

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu

¶39

To

¶40