M.Duraiswamy Vs the District Collector

Attur, Salem, being encroached by the fifth respondent and a consequential direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to restore the said lands to its original state.

¶23

For Petitioner Mr.S.T.Bharathi Gowtham

¶24

For Respondents Mr. T.K. Saravanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4

¶25

ORDER

¶26

[made by M.SUNDAR, J.]

¶27

Subject matter of captioned 'Writ Petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] is alleged encroachment in 'Survey Nos.473/1 (Pathway), 22/1 (Poramboke) and 22/6 (Poramboke) situate in Ammbasamuthuram Village, Attur, Salem District' (hereinafter 'said lands' for the sake of convenience and clarity).

¶28

Page Nos.2/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.26895 of 2025

¶31

Request for removal of aforereferred alleged encroachment/s by way of a representation dated 08.04.2025 has not yielded results and that has necessitated captioned WP, is the submission of learned counsel for writ petitioner.

¶32

Issue notice to official respondents (R1 to R4).

¶33

Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader,

¶34

accepts notice for official respondents. Learned State counsel submits that survey of said lands will be done within a period of six weeks from today, i.e., on or before 02.09.2025, and depending on the outcome of the survey, action for removal of encroachment (if found) will be commenced vide ' the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' {hereinafter 'said 1905 Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity} as expeditiously as the business of official respondents would permit but in any event within a period of six weeks therefrom, i.e. , on or before 14.10.2025. This submission is recorded.

¶35

Page Nos.3/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.26895 of 2025

¶38

Though obvious, we make it clear that all the rights and contentions of R5/private respondent stand preserved and this order does not impinge upon the rights of R5/private respondent. Therefore, there is no impediment in dispensing with notice to private respondent and taking up the captioned WP with the consent of the learned State counsel and learned counsel for writ petitioner. We do so.

¶39