Dismissed¶¶91

I. Sekar v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Feb 2025WP/26216/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regularization of contract hospital workers refused; consolidated pay Rs.2,000/- revised to Rs.3,800/-; G.O.Ms.No.284 H&FW(E1) Dept. 10.11.2011; outsourcing under G.O.Ms.No.325 H&FW Dept. 20.11.2012; policy decision not open to judicial interference; contract appointees cannot claim regularisation as of right; TNMSC; Rajiv Gandhi Govt. General Hospital; Article 226; certiorarified mandamus; Letter No.41598/C1/2009 dated 10.11.2014; W.P.No.26216 of 2015; Madras High Court; RMT.Teekaa Raman, J.; decided 05.02.2025; dismissed, no costs; petitioner side unrepresented (ex parte hearing).

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed with no costs. ¶¶91

I. Sekar Vs Government of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.02.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶6

1 I. Sekar

¶7

S/o Irusappan No.104 Kuttiappa Gramani Street,

¶8

Pumping Station Line, Sanyasipuram

¶9

Kilpauk, Chennai-10

¶10

2 V. Shanmugham

¶11

C/o Munuswamy, No.49 Barakka Road

¶12

Nammalwarpet Chennai-12

¶13

3 A. Senthilkumar

¶14

S/o Arumugham, No.510, Block-16,

¶15

Nagooran Garden, New Wahermenpet Chennai-81

¶16

4 V. Ekambaram

¶17

S/o Venkatesah, 730 2^nd Block, Mylai Balaji

¶18

Nagar, Pallikaranai, Chennai-10

¶19

5 V. Palani

¶20

S/o Velayudham, 2, Gandhi Nagar,

¶21

Dr.Ambedkar Bridge, Mylapore, Chennai-4

¶22

6 K. Srinivasan

¶23

P. Krishnan, 4/21, Raj Nagar Main Road

¶24

Mettukuppam, Okkiyam Thoraipakkam, Chennai-97.

¶25

7 M. Kalaivanan

¶26

S/o Manivel, 15/8 Jagannathapuram 5th Street Chetpet Chennai-31.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

1/8

¶29

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶30

8 Jaya Prakash

¶31

S/o P. Sekaran, 34 Shiva Shankaran Street

¶32

Erukkanchery, Chennai-118.

¶33

9 S. Bhaskar

¶34

S/o Selvaraj, 22/1 Sivarajapuram, Triplicane Chennai-5

¶35

10 M. Gopalakrishnan

¶36

S/o Muniyandi, 18/25, 1^st Street Tyagi Sathiyamoorthy Nagar Tiruvottiyur, Chennai-19.

¶37

11 M. Chandraprakash 1460, 4D Block VOC Nagar, Tondiarpet Chennai-81.

¶38

12 T. Shankar

¶39

S/o Then, 9, N.N. Garden, 9th Lane, Old Washermenpet, Chennai-81.

¶40

13 S. Natarajan

¶41

S/o Siva, 8 Sanjeevirayan Koil Lane, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 21

¶42

14 A. Elavani

¶43

4 Samayavarthamman Koil Street, Seven Wells Chennai-1

¶44

15 D. Venkatesan

¶45

S/o Dhakshnamurthy, 48/63 Annai Sathya Street Chennai-78.

¶46

16 K. Mala

¶47

2/8

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶50

W/o R. Kalaiarasan, 47-B Block Ranganathapuram Korukkupet, Chennai-21.

¶51

17 L. Lakshmi

¶52

W/o Lawrance, 55 V.O.C Nagar, 30th Street Pulianthope, Chennai-12.

¶53

18 M. Sargunadevi

¶54

W/o Mahalingam, 7 Bharathi Nagar, 1st Street Korukkupet Chennai-21.

¶55

19 L. Gladys Silvia W/o M. Kamaraj, 25 Government Farm 1^st Street, Saidapet Chennai-15.

¶56

... Petitioners

¶57

Vs.

¶58

1 Government of Tamil Nadu

¶59

Rep. by its Secretary, Health and Family

¶60

Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶61

2 The Managing Director

¶62

Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Ltd. 417 Pantheon Road, II Floor Egmore

¶63

Chennai-8

¶64

3 The Director of Medical

¶65

Education, Chennai-10

¶66

4 The Dean Rajiv Gandhi Govt. General Hospital Park Town Chennai.

¶67

... Respondents

¶68

3/8

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶71

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned letter dated 10.11.2014 made in Letter No.41598/C1/2009 passed by the 1 st respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to

¶72

regularize the petitioners as Hospital Workers with regular time scale of pay.

¶73

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶74

For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan (for 1 to 4) Government Advocate

¶75

O R D E R

¶76

This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the impugned letter dated 10.11.2014 made in Letter No.41598/C1/2009 passed by the 1 st respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to

¶77

regularize the petitioners as Hospital Workers with regular time scale of pay.

¶78

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, no one represented on behalf

¶79

of the petitioner.

¶80

3.Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents would

¶81

submit that the Petitioner Nos.4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 17 & 19 have already left the job

¶82

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶83

4/8

¶84

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶85

and they cannot be regularised. The learned Government Advocate would also submit that the second respondent Management has called for the list of candidates from the District Employment Exchanges and from the sponsored candidates 24 personnels were recruited among them as hospital workers on contract basis in consolidated pay at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month. Subsequently, by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.284, H & F W (E1) Dept., dated 10.11.2011, their consolidated pay was revised from Rs.2,000/- to Rs.3,800/per month. Thereafter by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.325, H & FW Dept. dated 20.11.2012, the services of the hospital workers in all the Medical College Hospitals and other hospitals having more than 200 beds were outsourced.

¶86

4.The learned Government Advocate would further submit that if the proposal for absorption of 24 hospital workers in regular vacancies is accepted, it will create a situation to come up with similar proposals from the personnels, who were appointed on consolidated pay by the TNMSC to bring them into regular time scale of pay.

¶87

5.After hearing the learned Government Advocate, I find that the petitioners were appointed as hospital workers on contract basis in the

¶88

5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶89

W.P.No.26216 of 2015

¶90

consolidated pay at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month and subsequently, the consolidated pay was revised to Rs.3,800/- per month, as per G.O.Ms.No.325, H & FW Dept. dated 20.11.2012, which is a policy decision of the Government. Since it is a policy decision of the Government, this Court cannot interfere with it, moreover, the persons who were appointed on contract basis in the consolidated pay cannot ask for regularisation as a matter of right and therefore, there is no merit in this case.

¶91

6.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶92

05.02.2025

¶93

Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

¶94

sai

¶95

6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶96

W.P.No.26216 of 2015