A.Baskaran v. The Revenue Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act 1905; Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905; self-contained code; Girnar Traders (3) (2011) 3 SCC 1; Girnar principle; C.Gopinathan 2025:MHC:1162; alternative remedy; Section 10 statutory appeal; Section 10-A revision to Government; Section 10-B stay/interim relief; Section 7 show-cause notice; Section 6 eviction order; Section 11(1) limitation 30 days; Article 226; Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Natham land; encroachment; Theerthanagiri Village; Kurinjipadi Taluk; Revenue Tahsildar; writ petition not entertainable; preservation of rights; 17-day appeal window. Summary: Three sibling writ petitions (Nos. 26021, 26023 and 26026 of 2022, filed 20.09.2022) by A.Baskaran, A.Radhakrishnan and A.Selvaraj against the Revenue Tahsildar, Tahsildar (Natham), Revenue Inspector and Village Administrative Officer over Natham S.No.179/1 parcels were disposed of on alternative-remedy grounds. The Court reaffirmed, on the Girnar touchstone, that the 1905 Act is a self-contained code and channelled the petitioners to the Section 10 appeal with Section 10-B stays, fixing a 17-day filing window and a four-week adjudication timeline, coercive action being contingent on the stay petitions; failing timely appeal, the State may enforce the 07.09.2022 eviction orders. No monetary quantum involved.