Dismissed¶23

M.Sampath v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC18 Dec 2025WP/25403/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn without costs; Madras High Court; Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J.; Article 226 Constitution of India; Certiorarified Mandamus; Sub Registrar Arakonam; RFL/Arakonam/16/2025 dated 06.05.2025; revocation of gift deed dated 05.05.2025; suo motu impleadment of Block Development Officer and President, Sembedu Village Panchayat; Inspector General of Registration; no substantive adjudication.

What did the court decide?

On learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that he was instructed to withdraw the writ petition, with an endorsement made for that purpose, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. ¶23

M.Sampath Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.12.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

W.P.No.25403 of 2025

¶6

M.Sampath ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶9

2.The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Arakonam.

¶10

3.The Block Development Officer, Sembedu Village Panchayat, Arakonam Taluk 632 506.

¶11

4.The President, Sembedu Village Panchayat, Arakonam Taluk 632 506. ... Respondents

¶12

(R3, R4 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 15.07.2025 made in W.P.No.25403 of 2025 by MSQJ)

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶14

India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2^nd respondent in RFL/Arakonam/16/2025 dated 06.05.2025

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and non-est in law and consequently, direct the 2^nd respondent to register the revocation of gift deed dated 05.05.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vijay For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan, 1 to 3 Special Government Pleader

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed

¶22

to withdraw the writ petition. An endorsement has been made for the said purpose.

¶23