B.Sridhar v. Director of Land Reforms
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC; W.P. No.249 of 2022; N. Anand Venkatesh J; 01.04.2025; disposed with directions. Keywords: Ayyan patta; land allotment/pattadar; land reforms; District Revenue Officer (Land Tribunal) Erode; Revenue Divisional Officer Erode; Tahsildar Perundhurai Taluk; Assistant Commissioner of Land Reforms; Director of Land Reforms; fresh representation; eight-week timeline; writ of certiorarified mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Na. Ka. 6488/2015/A4 (16.12.2016); Na. Ka. 15500/2015/A1 (25.5.2017); order dated 28.12.2013; respondents 1-5 represented by Additional Government Pleader M.R. Gokul Krishnan; petitioner's counsel S. Sai Shankar. No precedent cited; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions: petitioner to file a fresh representation before the 2nd respondent with all relevant documents; 2nd respondent to pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law within eight weeks of receipt; no costs awarded.