Dismissed¶29

R.Manjulabai v. the District Collector

Madras HC2 Jul 2025WP/23956/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Mohammed Shaffiq J, 02.07.2025, W.P.No.23956 of 2025 / WMP No.26948 of 2025 - writ petition under Article 226 seeking writ of mandamus against District Collector Salem, Tahsildar Yercaud Taluk, Director and Project Director Tribal Welfare Department, to restrain entry/work on Survey No.7 (12.5 acres), Piliyur village, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District, based on representation dated 12.06.2025; withdrawn by counsel M/s.S.Vinodha with endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedies, no costs; WMP closed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy in the manner known to law; no order as to costs; consequential closure of WMP No.26948 of 2025. ¶29

R.Manjulabai Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.23956 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.07.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.No.23956 of 2025

¶7

and WMP No.26948 of 2025

1.R.Manjulabai

2.Thilagam

3.Violet Biyula

: Petitioners

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Salem District

¶14

2.The Tahsildar, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District

¶15

3.The Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Ezhilagam building Chepauk, Chennai 600 005

¶16

4.The Project Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Salem 600 001 : Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from entering/

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.23956 of 2025

¶21

commencing any work in the petitioners' property comprising in Survey No.7, measuring 12.5 acres situated at Piliyur village, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District based on the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2025.

¶22

For Petitioners : M/s.S.Vinodha

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish, Additional Government Pleader

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the

¶26

petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶27

2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel

¶28

for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. There shall be no order as to

¶29

costs. Consequently, WMP No.26948 of 2025 is closed.

¶30

02.07.2025

¶31

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mrn

¶32

2/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.No.23956 of 2025