C.Perumalsamy Vs Income Tax Officer

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records contained in order dated 20.07.2022 bearing ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043953513(1) issued by the respondent for AY 2017-18 for PAN:ATXPM5780B and all consequential notices, letters and orders thereto, including notice dated

¶12

Page No. 1 of 16

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

20.07.2022 bearing ITBA/AST/M/148-1/2022-23/1043957070(1) issued by the respondent under Section 148 of the Act for 2017-18 for PAN ATXPM5780B

¶15

and to quash the same and to consequentially forbear the respondent, or it superiors, subordinates, agents, etc., from re-assessing the petitioner's income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.Avinash Krishnan Ravi Junior Standing Counsel Mr.B. Ramana Kumar Standing Senior Counsel

¶18

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This case was dismissed vide Order dated 11.11.2025. The operative portion of the order was dictated in open Court. However, while finalizing

¶21

the detailed order, a doubt was entertained as to whether a correct conclusion was

¶22

arrived on 11.11.2025 or not.

¶23

2. After perusing the documents and the list of dates and events

¶24

qua Paragraph No.28 from the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of

¶25

Page No. 2 of 16

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

India V s . Ashish Agarwal , (2023) 1 SCC 617 and Paragraph Nos.112 and 114

¶28

from the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India V s. Rajeev

¶29

Bansal , 2024 SCC Online SC 2993, it has been necessary to recall the order dated

¶30

11.11.2025.

¶31

3. For a fair disposal of the case, it will be therefore useful to

¶32

refer to passage from Paragraph No.28 from Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra )

¶33

and Paragraph Nos.112 and 114 from Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ) .

¶34

4. For the sake of clarity, Paragraph No.28 from Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra ) is reproduced below:-

¶35

“ 28. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are allowed in part. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:

¶36

(i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be show cause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees

¶37

Page No. 3 of 16

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assessees can reply to the show cause notices within two weeks thereafter ;

¶40

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a onetime measure visàvis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required;

¶41

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned assessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as substituted) ;

¶42

(iv) All defences which may be available to the assesses including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021 and in law shall continue to be available. ”

¶43

5. In Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ), the above decision of the

¶44

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra ) was re-examined.

¶45

Page No. 4 of 16

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

The Hon’ble Supreme Court framed the following questions of law / issues in

¶48

Paragraph No.18. Paragraph No.18 from Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ) is

¶49

reproduced below:-

¶50

“ (a) Whether the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and notifications issued under it will also apply to reassessment notices issued after April 1, 2021; and

¶51

(b) Whether the reassessment notices issued under section 148 of the new regime between July and September 2022 are valid.”

¶52

6 . The above questions of law / issues have been answered in

¶53

Paragraph No.114 and illustrated in Paragraph No.112 of Rajeev Bansal case

¶54

(cited supra ) .

¶55

7. For the sake of clarity, Paragraph Nos.112 and 114 from Rajeev

¶56

Bansal case (cited supra ) are extracted hereunder:-

¶57

“ 112. Let us take the instance of a notice issued on May 1, 2021 under the old regime for a relevant assessment year. Because of the legal fiction, the deemed show-cause notices will also come into effect from May 1, 2021. After accounting for all the

¶58

Page No. 5 of 16

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶60

exclusions, the Assessing Officer will have sixty-one days (days between May 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021) to issue a notice under section 148 of the new regime. This time starts ticking for the Assessing Officer after receiving the response of the assessee. In this instance, if the assessee submits the response on June 18, 2022, the Assessing Officer will have sixty one days from June 18, 2022 to issue a reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime. Thus, in this illustration, the time limit for issuance of a notice under section 148 of the new regime will end on August 18, 2022.

¶61

114. In view of the above discussion, we conclude that:

¶62

a. After April 1, 2021, the Income Tax Act has to be read along with the substituted provisions;

¶63

b. Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 will continue to apply to the Income-tax Act after April 1, 2021 if any action or proceeding specified under the substituted provisions of the Income Tax Act falls for completion between March 20, 2020 and March 31, 2021;

¶64

c. Section 3(1) of the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 overrides section 149 of the Income-tax Act only to the extent of relaxing the time limit for

¶65

Page No. 6 of 16

¶66

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶67

issuance of a reassessment notice under section 148;

¶68

d. Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 will extend the time limit for the grant of sanction by the authority specified under section 151. The test to determine whether Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 will apply to section 151 of the new regime is this : if the time limit of three years from the end of an assessment year falls between March 20, 2020 and March 31, 2021, then the specified authority under section 151(i) has extended time till June 30, 2021 to grant approval;

¶69

e. In the case of section 151 of the old regime, the test is : if the time limit of four years from the end of an assessment year falls between March 20, 2020 and March 31, 2021, then the specified authority under section 151(2) has extended time till March 31, 2021 to grant approval;

¶70

f. The directions in Union of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal [(2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC); (2023) 1 SCC 617] will extend to all the ninety thousand reassessment notices issued under the old regime during the period April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021;

¶71

Page No. 7 of 16

¶72

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶73

g. The time during which the show- cause notices were deemed to be stayed is from the date of issuance of the deemed notice between April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021 till the supply of relevant information and material by the Assessing Officers to the assessees in terms of the directions issued by this court in Union of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal [(2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC); (2023) 1 SCC 617], and the period of two weeks allowed to the assessees to respond to the show-cause notices; and

¶74

h. The Assessing Officers were required to issue the reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime within the time limit surviving under the Income-tax Act read with the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions Act, 2020. All notices issued beyond the surviving period are time barred and liable to be set aside.”

¶75

8. Applying the above ratio, particularly, in the light of the

¶76

limitation for issuance of Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

¶77

(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) prescribed under Section 149 of the Act

¶78

read with Section 151 of the Act, it is clear that the Notice that was issued after

¶79

Page No. 8 of 16

¶80

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶81

1st April, 2021 under the old regime as it stood till 31.03.2021 has to be treated

¶82

as a Notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act under the new regime in terms of

¶83

Paragraph No.28.1 of Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra ) and in terms of

¶84

Paragraph No.114(g) of Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ) .

¶85

9. The time during which the aforesaid Notice issued under Section

¶86

148 of the Act under the old regime as it stood till 31.03.2021 were deemed to

¶87

be stayed from the date of issuance between April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021

¶88

till the supply of relevant information and material by the Assessing Officers to

¶89

the assessees in terms of the directions issued by this Court in Ashish Agarwal

¶90

case (cited supra ), and for a further period of two weeks forthe assessees to

¶91

respond to the Show Cause Notices as confirmed by Rajeev Bansal case (cited

¶92

supra ).

¶93

10. Relevant dates from the facts of the present case are as follows:-

¶94

Assessment Year 2017-2018

¶95

Page No. 9 of 16

¶96

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶97

Notice / Event	Date
Notice under Section 148 of the Act (old regime)	30.06.2021
Ashish Agarwal Case	04.05.2022
Notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act	27.05.2022
Time granted to issue Notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act as per Ashish Agarwal Case (30 days)	02.06.2022
Reply given by the Petitioner	16.06.2022
Order under Section 148A(d) of the Act (new regime)	20.07.2022
Notice under Section 148 of the Act (new regime)	20.07.2022

¶98

11. Applying the above ratio to the facts of the case it is clear that

¶99

the Notice that was issued on 30.06.2021 under Section 148 of the Act under the

¶100

old regime as it stood till 31.03.2021 has to be treated as a Notice issued under

¶101

Section 148A(b) of the Act in terms of Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra ) and

¶102

Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ) .

¶103

Page No. 10 of 16

¶104

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶105

12. A Notice under Section 148 of the Act was required to be

¶106

issued for reassessment within the time limit surviving under the Taxation and

¶107

Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) [TOLA] Act,

¶108

2020. In the present case, since the income escaping assessment allegedly is less

¶109

thanRs.50,00,000/- viz., Rs.36,96,500/- for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, the

¶110

Notice under Section 148 of the Act ought to have been issued on 31.03.2021 .

¶111

However, by virtue of TOLA extensions, the said date has been extended up to

¶112

30.06.2021 .

¶113

13. In the light of the ratio in Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra )

¶114

and Rajeev Bansal case (cited supra ), the Notice issued under Section 148 of

¶115

the Act under the old regime on 30.06.2021 is deemed to have been stayed for

¶116

thirty days for the Income Tax Department to provide to the respective assessees

¶117

Page No. 11 of 16

¶118

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶119

information and material relied upon and two weeks thereafter for the assessees

¶120

to reply to the Show Cause Notices.

¶121

14. In the present case, Notice under Section 148 of the Act under

¶122

the old regime itself was issued on the last date of limitation viz., 30.06.2021 ,

¶123

after the exclusions i.e., excluding the thirty days and fourteen days time period

¶124

granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal case (cited supra )

¶125

there is no further time available for the Assessing Officer to issue Notice under

¶126

Section 148 of the Act under the new regime barring the seven days as provided

¶127

under the fourth Proviso to Section 149 of the Act as amended with effect from

¶128

01.04.2021. This is evident from the illustration in Paragraph No.112 of Rajeev

¶129

Bansal case (cited supra ) .

¶130

Page No. 12 of 16

¶131

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶132

15. Therefore, after accounting for all the exclusions, the Assessing

¶133

Officer in the present case had no time left for issuance of Notice under Section

¶134

148 of the Act under the new regime. However, applying the fourth Proviso to

¶135

Section 149 of the Act as amended with effect from 01.04.2021, the Assessing

¶136

Officer had seven days to issue a Notice under Section 148 of the Act under the

¶137

new regime.

¶138

16. Thus, the Notice under Section 148 of the Act ought to have

¶139

been issued within seven days from the date of reply given by the Petitioner on

¶140

16.06.2022. In other words, the Notice ought to have been issued on or before

¶141

23.06.2022 .

¶142

17. However, in the present case, the Notice under Section 148 of

¶143

the Act under the new regime was issued only on 20.07.2022.

¶144

Page No. 13 of 16

¶145

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶146

18. Thus, the proceedings initiated on 30.06.2021 which were later

¶147

substituted by a Notice under Section 148A(b) dated 27.05.2022 which culminated in the impugned Order passed under Section 148A(d) dated

¶148

20.07.2022 and Notice issued under Section 148 dated 20.07.2022 are to be held

¶149

to be beyond time.

¶150

19. In view thereof, this Writ Petition challenging these two proceedings

¶151

deserve to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. No costs. Connected Writ

¶152

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶153

25.11.2025

¶154

Neutral Citation : Yes / No nvi

¶155

Page No. 14 of 16

¶156

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶157

C.SARAVANAN.J.

¶158

nvi

¶159

W.P.No.23815 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26962, 22798 & 22799 of 2022

¶160

Page No. 15 of 16

¶161

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶162

25.11.2025

¶163

Page No. 16 of 16

¶164

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Perumalsamy v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Perumalsamy v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E2e Supply Chain Solutions Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Shri Chakra Agencies Vs State Tax officer

Rangadurai Vs The Assessment Unit

Shri. Vadivelu Suresh Vs Income Tax officer

Veena Gupta Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Dharmesh Kumar Vs Income Tax officer