Dismissed¶22

R.Lalitha v. the Deputy Inspector General of Prison

Madras HC5 Feb 2025WP/2313/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; ordinary leave for convict prisoner; Central Prison-1, Puzhal; Certiorarified Mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; counsel's endorsement to withdraw; no costs; connected W.M.P.No.2631 of 2025 closed; no substantive determination — not citable for any proposition on prison leave.

What did the court decide?

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ¶22

R.Lalitha Vs the Deputy Inspector General of Prison — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.2313 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.02.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR

¶8

W.P.No.2313 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.2631 of 2025

R.Lalitha

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶13

2.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records No.595439/Tha Ku2/2024 dated 30.12.2024 passed by respondent No.2, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's husband namely Raja, S/o.Mannankatti, aged 46 years, Convict Prisoner No.10020, (PID 63939) now confined in the Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai – 66.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4

¶17

W.P.No.2313 of 2025

¶18

F or Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J. )

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶22

2 . In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶23

[M.S.R, J.] [N.S, J.] 05.02.2025

¶24

Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order

¶25

Sni

¶26