Sujay Gopal Rao v. Government of India
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.No.2290 of 2024, Madras HC, decided 27.10.2025 by G.K. Ilanthiraiyan J. Retired Indian Overseas Bank officers (posted at Hongkong, Malaysia, Bangkok) sought mandamus under Article 226 for implementation of WGSC (Working Group of Standing Committee) approved terms and revised salary, perks and accumulated interest for overseas service. Dismissed: WGSC recommendations require Board consent, which the bank's Board never gave; post-superannuation claim to WGSC salary/pension impermissible; mandamus enforces only existing legal rights and petitioners had no legally enforceable right to retrospective WGSC salary. Context: Ministry of Finance guidelines dated 04.11.2011; RBI Prompt Corrective Action in force till 29.09.2021; unrevised overseas pay after 2014; representations after circular dated 02.01.2020 unanswered; other PSBs implemented WGSC revisions. No costs ordered. No precedents cited.