M.Vijaykumar Vs the District Collector

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P. No.22743 of 2025

¶22

pertaining the report filed by the 2nd respondents Ref.No.Na.Ka.No.3190/2022/ A6 dated 12.07.2023 namely the Tahsildar, Tiruttani Taluk Office, Tiruttani Taluk, Thiruvallur District-631 209 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to survey the land of the petitioner with the help of the 3rd respondent who is the head surveyor fixing the boundaries for the same by using police aid and further direct the 2nd respondent to issue a separate patta in the name of the petitioner to the land comprised in survey No.92/7 with an extent of 0.36 cents out of total extent 1.06 acre situated at No.44, Veerakaveripuram (VKR) Tiruttani taluk within a stipulated time.

¶23

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G.K.Sekar

¶24

For Respondent(s) : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader(for R1 to R3) Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl Side) (for R4)

¶25

ORDER

¶26

By consent of learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is taken up

¶27

for final disposal at the admission stage itself. In view of the order that this Court proposes to pass and also the limited relief that is sought to be granted, notice to Respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with.

¶28

2. The present writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the order of the 2 nd respondent dated 12.07.2023, quash

¶29

2/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P. No.22743 of 2025

¶32

the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to survey petitioner's property with the help of the 3rd respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent to issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner.

¶33

3. After submitting for a brief while, the learned counsel for petitioner

¶34

sought the permission of this Court to file an appeal without reference to limitation, which was not objected to by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶35

4. In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal. If any such appeal is filed, while reckoning the period of limitation the appellate authority shall admit and entertain the appeal without reference to limitation and pass appropriate orders after affording the petitioner and other interested parties an opportunity of hearing. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶36

26.06.2025

¶37

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index : Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mka

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P. No.22743 of 2025

¶41

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.