The Commissioner v. The Regional Provident fund commissioner - II
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition dismissed as infructuous; Maraimalai Nagar Municipality v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – II, Tambaram; challenge to CGIT cum Labour Court order dated 06.06.2022 in EPFA No.257/2019 requiring deposit of 40% of EPF contribution under challenge as precondition for hearing appeal; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; conditional order complied with; no costs; connected W.M.P.No.21671 of 2022 closed; decided 25.06.2025 by P. Dhanabal, J.; no ruling on merits of pre-deposit condition.
What did the court decide?
Recording the submission of the petitioner's counsel that the conditional order had been complied with, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the 40% deposit condition. ¶18