Dismissed¶28

V.Devan v. Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC5 Feb 2025WP/21700/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.21700 of 2024; V.Devan v. Government of Tamil Nadu, Greater Chennai Corporation, Executive Engineer Zone-14, Revenue Divisional Officer Sholinganallur, Tahsildar Sholinganallur; writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus for approval of building plan dated 8.9.2023 and desealing of premises; counsel Ms.Abinaya Raj (petitioner), Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda, Standing Counsel (R2 & R3), no appearance for R1, R4 & R5; petition withdrawn with endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; decided 05.02.2025; no merits adjudicated; no cases or statutes beyond Article 226 engaged.

What did the court decide?

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle; accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs. ¶28

V.Devan Vs Government of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.21700 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.02.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

W.P.No.21700 of 2024

V.Devan

.. Petitioner

Government of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary to Government Housing & Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

¶12

Greater Chennai Corporation represented by its Commissioner Ripon Building, Poonamallee High Road Chennai 600 003

¶13

The Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-14, Unit-42, Division-188 Puzhuthivakkam, Chennai 600 091

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119

¶15

(R4 impleaded as per order dated 26.09.2024 in WMP.26620/2024 in WP.21700/2024)

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.21700 of 2024

¶19

Tahsildar, Sholinganallur

¶20

New Kumaran Nagar, Sholinganallur Chennai 600 119

¶21

(R5 impleaded as per order dated 26.09.2024 in WMP.28215/2024 in WP.21700/2024) .. Respondents

¶22

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to approve the building plan which was submitted by the petitioner dated 8.9.2023 and consequentially direct the respondents to deseal the premises.

¶23

For Petitioner :: Ms.Abinaya Raj For Respondents :: Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda Standing Counsel for R2 & R3 No appearance for R1, R4 & R5

¶24

ORDER

¶25

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

¶26

The learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition

¶27

and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

¶28

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.