J.Jamal v. the Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporaiton
Writ of Mandamus – negative prayer not entertainable
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, W.P.No.21552 of 2024, decided 14.02.2025, S.M. Subramaniam and K. Rajasekar, JJ. (order by S.M. Subramaniam, J.). Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to restrain Greater Chennai Corporation, CMDA and Zonal Officer Zone-XII from locking and sealing premises at Nanganallur, Chennai during pendency of Section 80A Tamil Nadu Town and Country Plan Act appeal dated 16.10.2020 (respondents stating disposal on 28.10.2024). Dismissed: negative prayers against action for unauthorized construction not entertainable; authorities empowered to initiate all appropriate actions per due procedure under the Act and Rules irrespective of appeal status. Keywords: unauthorized construction, locking and sealing, negative prayer, mandamus refused, writ dismissed, Greater Chennai Corporation, CMDA.
What did the court decide?
Relief preventing the authorities from initiating actions against unauthorized construction cannot be granted; a negative prayer sought by the petitioner is not entertainable, though the competent authorities are empowered to initiate actions if the petitioner's building is identified as unauthorized.