Dismissed¶24

R.Jeeva v. the Regional Deputy Commissioner(North)

Madras HC18 Aug 2025WP/21380/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ of certiorari under Article 226 against Greater Chennai Corporation order No.Z.O.V.C. No./4602/2025 dated 08.05.2025; petitioner R.Jeeva absent on three hearing dates (25.06.2025, 21.07.2025, 18.08.2025); connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner's absence of representation on three successive hearing dates (25.06.2025, 21.07.2025 and 18.08.2025) clearly indicates that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the writ petition. ¶23

R.Jeeva Vs the Regional Deputy Commissioner(North) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P No. 21380 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED:18.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE N. MALA

¶6

WP No. 21380 of 2025 and WMP.No. 24127 of 2025

R.Jeeva

...Petitioner

The Regional Deputy Commissioner (North) Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone – 5) Royapuram, Chennai-600013.

¶11

..Respondent

¶12

Writ Petition is field under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorari, calling for the records in respect of order No.Z.O.V.C. No./4602/2025 dated 08.05.2025 passed by the respondent, affixed on the petitioner's door on 19.05.2025 and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner: No Appearance

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.S.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a writ of certiorari, calling for the records in respect of order No.Z.O.V.C. No./4602/2025 dated 08.05.2025

¶17

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P No. 21380 of 2025

¶20

passed by the respondent, affixed on the petitioner's door on 19.05.2025 and quash the same.

¶21

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 25.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence the registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'For dismissal' on 21.07.2025. Again, on 21.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, and the registry was again directed to list the matter on 18.08.2025 under the caption 'For dismissal'

¶22

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner, which clearly indicates that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the writ petition.

¶23