Disposed¶29

K.Vijayakumar v. the Director General of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2025WP/20883/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.No.20883 of 2025, K.Vijayakumar v. Director General of Police & Joint Commissioner of Police, East Zone, Greater Chennai Police; Madras High Court, C. Kumarappan J., 13.06.2025; misplaced service register (2013); Special Sub Inspector; service/retirement benefits for 2013-2017; representation dated 03.01.2025 unanswered; writ of Mandamus under Article 226; direction to consider representation within six weeks; disposed of, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 03.01.2025 and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law within six weeks; no costs. ¶29

K.Vijayakumar Vs the Director General of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.20883 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

W.P.No.20883 of 2025

K.Vijayakumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 004.

¶11

The Joint Commissioner of Police, East Zone, Greater Chennai Police, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to take action expeditiously on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2025 to provide with the service benefits between 2013 to 2017.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramamurthy For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.20883 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider

¶19

the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2025, and sanction service benefits for the period from 2013 to 2017.

¶20

2 . The grievance of the petitioner is that during 2013, his service register got misplaced and on account of that, the benefits which has been conferred upon him, as the Special Sub Inspector was not calculated while sanctioning retirement benefits. In this connection, he sent a representation to the first respondent dated 03.01.2025, and the same is yet to be considered. Hence the present writ petition has been filed.

¶21

Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that no order

¶22

has been passed by the respondents on the petitioner's representation till date.

¶23

At this juncture, Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents would fairly submit that they would consider the petitioner's representation within a reasonable time.

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.20883 of 2025

¶27

In such view of the matter, this Court without going into the

¶28

merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2025, and pass order on it's own merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the above

direction. No costs.

13.06.2025

veda

Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶34

¶35