Dismissed¶27

V.Venugopal (Deceased) v. The Joint Commissioner

Madras HC3 Sept 2025WP/2007/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission; no merits adjudicated. Keywords: W.P.No.2007 of 2020; Madras High Court; M. Dhandapani; Article 226; Certiorarified Mandamus; HR&CE Department Vellore; Joint Commissioner; Assistant Commissioner; Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narayana Reddy Chartram, Thottapalayam; Notice No.3092/2018 (ITMS Code 4796)M1 dated 29.11.2019; O.A.No.2 of 2019 scheme application; Srimath Thukkaram Swamigal Madayalam, Kalasapalayam, Vellore; infructuous; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

V.Venugopal (Deceased) Vs The Joint Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.2007 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.09.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.2007 of 2020

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P.Nos.2345 & 2347 of 2020

¶9

1.V.Venugopal (Deceased)

2.V.B.Muralikrishnan

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore.

¶14

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore.

¶15

3.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narayana Reddy Chartram, Thottapalayam, Vellore – 632 004. ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent herein in Notice No.3092/2018 (ITMS Code 4796)M1 dated 29.11.2019 and quash the same and further direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere with the management of Srimath Thukkaram Swamigal Madayalam, Kalasapalayam, Vellore – 1

¶17

Page No.1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.2007 of 2020

¶20

before the 1

¶21

till the disposal of the scheme application in O.A.No.2 of 2019 pending before the 1^st respondent herein.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Velmurugan For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthikeyan Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.Wilson Topaz for M/s.A.S.Kailasam & Associates [R3] *****

¶23

ORDER

¶24

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for

¶25

the petitioners submitted that by efflux of time, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and there is nothing survives for adjudication.

¶26

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for

¶27

the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

03.09.2025

¶29

Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No sp

¶30

¶31

Page No.2 of 4

¶32