Disposed¶28

M/s.Sakthi sugars Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC10 Jun 2025WP/19374/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sakthi Sugars Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu & others; Madras High Court; WP No. 19374 of 2022; WMP No. 18674 of 2022; Justice N. Anand Venkatesh; decided 10-06-2025; sugar cane allotment; Arachalur Firka; Erode District; 35th De Limitation Committee recommendations; impugned order dated 18.10.2007; Commissioner of Sugar and Cane Commissioner; E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited; writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Article 226; petition closed as infructuous; no costs; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

None — writ petition closed as infructuous at the petitioner's own request; connected Miscellaneous Petition (WMP No. 18674 of 2022) closed; no costs. ¶28

M/s.Sakthi sugars Limited Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

1/5

¶2

WP No. 19374 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 10-06-2025

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶7

WP No. 19374 of 2022 and WMP No. 18674 of 2022

¶8

M/s.Sakthi Sugars Limited Rep. by its Senior General Manager, Aval Poondurai, Poondurai Semur Village, Erode District

¶9

Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Agriculture (S1) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009

¶12

2.The Commissioner of Sugar and Cane Commissioner Aavin Illam, 2nd Floor, 3 Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 3.M/s. E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited Rep. by its General Manager -Legal, Dare House, 234 NSC bose Road, Chennai 600 034

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

2/5 WP No. 19374 of 2022

¶16

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 18.10.2007 of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to allot Arachalur Firka of Erode District for development and drawal of cane in favour of the petitioner as per the recommendations of 35th De Limitation Committee.

¶17

For Petitioner(s): Mr.AR.Karthiklakshmanan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Ganesan Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the

¶20

impugned order dated 18.10.2007 of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the

¶21

same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to allot Arachalur Firka of Erode District for development and drawal of cane in favour of the petitioner as per

¶22

the recommendations of 35th De Limitation Committee.

¶23

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for

¶24

by the petitioner has become infructuous.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

3/5

¶27

WP No. 19374 of 2022