T.S.Seethalakshmi Vs the District Collector

happens to be the husband of the first petitioner, has been in a comatose condition. Since there is no provision of law under which a guardian can be appointed for a comatose patient, the petitioners have moved the present writ petition.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/11 WP No. 18994 of 2025

¶46

4. A Division Bench of this Court has directed that, for appointment of guardian for a comatose patient, a writ petition is maintainable – See, (2024) 3 CTC 639. However, they have directed that, before a conclusion is arrived at by the Court, reports must be received from (i) the jurisdictional Tahsildar as to who is taking care of the comatose patient; and (ii) the Medical Board of the local area as regards the medical condition of the comatose patient.

¶47

5. Accordingly, the newly impleaded respondent No.5, for whom Mrs.Sneha takes notice, shall form a Medical Board to inspect Mr.Vinoth Kumar, who is residing at No.5, Karpagam Garden, Thelugupalayam, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore-641 039 and shall submit a report to this Court by 10.06.2025. In the mean time, the Tahsildar, Thelugupalayam, shall conduct a local enquiry and shall also submit a report to this Court as to who is taking care of the comatose patient.

¶48

Call on 10.6.2025.

¶49

3.When the writ petition was taken up for hearing today, the report of the

¶50

Medical Board was placed before this Court and the findings of the Medical

¶51

Board is extracted hereunder:

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5/11

WP No. 18994 of 2025

Awake

Not Obeying Not responding to commands Spastic Quadriparesis

¶57

4.It is quite evident from the above report that the 1st petitioner's husband

¶58

viz., Vinoth Kumar is virtually in vegetative state and hence, this Court is

¶59

inclined to consider the request made by the petitioners. It is also brought to the

¶60

notice of this Court that the 2nd petitioner who is the father of the said Vinoth

¶61

Kumar died during the pendency of this writ petition.

¶62

5.This Court had an occasion to deal with a similar issue in

¶63

W.P.No.20544 of 2025 and disposed of the writ petition by issuing necessary

¶64

directions on 11.06.2025 and the relevant portions are extracted hereunder:

¶65

6. A similar issue arose before the Division Bench of this Court in S.Sasikala vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others [W.A.No.1538 of 2024]. This writ appeal was disposed of by order dated 23.05.2024. The Division Bench took note of the Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court and also the order

¶66

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶67

6/11 WP No. 18994 of 2025

¶68

passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.4370 of 2022 dated 06.07.2022. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ appeal was disposed of in the following terms:

¶69

"8. In this view of the matter, the order

¶70

impugned in the writ appeal dated 23.04.2024 in W.P.No.11314 of 2024 is set aside and the following

¶71

directions are issue:

¶72

(a) The appellant herein is appointed as the guardian for the person as well as properties of Thiru.M.Sivakumar, husband of the appellant.

¶73

(b) It is stated that the immovable property bearing No.80, Waltax Road, Chennai-600 003 belongs to Thiru.Sivakumar. The appellant is permitted to deal with the property on behalf of Thiru.Sivakumar. We are not sure about the valuation of the property. We conservatively assume that it may fetch more than a Crore of rupees. The appellant has to ensure that a sum of Rs.50 lakhs is deposited in a nationalized bank in the name of Thiru.M.Sivakumar. The deposit amount will fetch interest and the accrued interest can

¶74

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶75

7/11 WP No. 18994 of 2025

¶76

be withdrawn by the appellant once in three months. Fixed Deposit so created shall remain till the life time of Thiru.Sivakumar. After his demise, it will go in three equal shares in favour of his legal heirs viz., wife S.Sasikala, daughter S.Durga Devi and son S.Akash. We have incorporated such a condition only for the benefit of the family. Only if there is a fixed deposit, it will ensure that at least the survival needs are met.

¶77

(c) The appellant is directed to file an affidavit before the Registry of this Court indicating the compliance of the direction to create Fixed Deposit in the name of Thiru.Sivakumar to the tune of Rs.50 lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only)."

¶78

6.In the considered view of this Court, the said Vinoth Kumar is not in a

¶79

position to take care of himself and he is virtually in vegetative state. Therefore, guardian will have to be necessarily appointed to deal with the bank account

¶80

and also to deal with the properties in order to spend for the medical expenditure and the family expenditure.

¶81

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶82

8/11

¶83

WP No. 18994 of 2025

¶84

7.In the light of the above discussion, this writ petition is disposed of in

¶85

the following terms: