S.Durai Udaiyar Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

S.Durai Udaiyar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu-Nadarajar Maaligai, Egmore, Chennai -8. 2.The Commissioner, Avadi Muncipality, Avadi, Chennai – 54.

¶10

3.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Kattupakkam, No.18, Bajanai Koil Street, Lakshmi Nagar, Kattupakkam, Chennai – 56. ... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to conduct an enquiry

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

1/5

¶14

W.P.No.1887 of 2025

¶15

about the illegal constructions on the petitioner's land in S.Nos.122 & 137 which is situated at Kattupakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District and to take suitable action against the unauthorized construction in view of the Town and Country Plan Act, 1971.

¶16

For Petitioner	: Ms.Manikuyil.K
For R1	: Mr.C.Manoharan Standing Counsel for CMDA
For R2	: Mr.R.A.Gopinath, Senior Counsel
For R3	: Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Special Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

¶19

The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents to conduct an enquiry about the illegal constructions on the petitioner's land in S.Nos.122 & 137 which is situated at Kattupakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District and to take suitable action against the unauthorized construction in view of the Town and Country Plan Act, 1971.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

2/5

¶22

W.P.No.1887 of 2025

¶23

Admittedly, the subject land is a private land and the petitioner claims

¶24

ownership of the property. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that some third parties have encroached upon the property belongs to the petitioner. Though, names are mentioned in the affidavit, those parties have not been impleaded as party respondents in the writ proceedings. In respect of such disputes of civil nature, the petitioner has to approach the competent Civil Court of Law for securing necessary relief.

¶25

Granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court of law, the

¶26

present writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

(S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.)

¶28

26.03.2025

¶29

ssi Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/5

W.P.No.1887 of 2025

To:

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu-Nadarajar Maaligai, Egmore, Chennai -8.

¶35

2.The Commissioner, Avadi Muncipality, Avadi, Chennai – 54.

¶36

3.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Kattupakkam, No.18, Bajanai Koil Street, Lakshmi Nagar, Kattupakkam, Chennai – 56.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/5

¶39

W.P.No.1887 of 2025

¶40

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM., J.

¶41

AND

¶42

K. RAJASEKAR., J.

ssi

W.P.No.1887 of 2025

26.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

5/5

S.Durai Udaiyar v. the Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Durai Udaiyar v. the Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.S.Shanmugasundaram Vs The State of TamilNadu

Dr.Pudupet Subramanian Krishnamoorthy Vs Member Secretary

The Director (Private Schools) Vs Krishnaveni

M. Sujatha Vs National Medical Commission

J.Gangatharan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S.Nagammal Street Resident Welfare Association Vs the State of Tamil Nadu