Dismissed¶21

Dr. K.N. Nanjuda Rao v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Nov 2025WP/18862/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Article 226 mandamus; removal of third respondent's name from property tax assessment No.153/017/900194 (Old Tax No.153/3200644); SIPCOT Staff Housing Colony, Hosur; District Collector Krishnagiri; Commissioner Hosur Municipality; representation dated 08.04.2025; withdrawal memo; no order as to costs; Madras High Court, 27.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the memo circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner; no order as to costs. ¶21

Dr. K.N. Nanjuda Rao Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.18862 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 27.11.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

W.P.No.18862 of 2025

Dr.K.N.Nanjunda Rao

.. Petitioner

1.The District Collector, First Floor, Collectorate, Krishnagiri – 635 115.

¶11

2.Commissioner, Hosur Municipality, Hosur City Municipal Corporation Office, Bagalur Road, Opposite to Thillai Nagar, Hosur – 635 109.

¶12

3.Sundarrajan

¶13

.. Respondents

¶14

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the name of the third respondent name in the tax assessment vide tax assessment No.153/017/900194 (Old Tax No.153/3200644) for the petitioner’s property situated at Plot No.160, SIPCOT Staff Housing Colony, Opposite to Lal, SIPCOT, Hosur – 635 126 an extent of 217.80 square meter and to assess the tax assessment in petitioner’s name by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 08.04.2025.

¶15

1/3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.18862 of 2025

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundarraman For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal. Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

¶21

withdraw the writ petition and he has also circulated a memo in this regard to the Registry. In view of the said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶22

27.11.2025

¶23

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi

¶24

¶25