Dismissed¶25

E.Y.Jayapandian(Deceased) v. M/s.TamilNadu Dhadha

Madras HC26 Mar 2025WP/17221/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; Article 226; Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Tamil Nadu Dhadha Pharmaceutical Ltd.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.; First Additional Labour Court, Chennai; I.D.No.739 of 1998; I.A.No.156 of 2002; order dated 27.04.2016; dismissal order; reinstatement; monetary benefits; liberty to challenge settlement; endorsement by counsel; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; M. Dhandapani, J.; decision date 26.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the settlement and to work out the remedy in the manner known to law; dismissed without costs. ¶25

E.Y.Jayapandian(Deceased) Vs M/s.TamilNadu Dhadha — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.17221 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.03.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.17221 of 2018

¶7

E.Y.Jayapandian (Deceased)

Easter Raj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.M/s.Tamil Nadu Dhadha Pharmaceutical Ltd., Dhadha Nagar,

¶12

Chennai – 600 074.

¶13

2.M/s.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Dhadha Nagar, Chennai – 600 074.

¶14

3.The Presiding Officer, First Additional Labour Court, City Civil Court Buildings, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order dated 27.04.2016 made in I.A.No.156 of 2002 in I.D.No.739 of 1998 and the consequential order of dismissal dated 27.04.016 made in I.D.No.739 of 1998 passed by the 3^rd respondent and to quash the same, consequently, direct the 2^nd respondent to pay all monetary benefits as the father of the petitioner E.Y.Jayapandiyan was reinstated in service.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No.1 of 4

¶19

W.P.No.17221 of 2018

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Shakul Hameed for M/s.C.Prabakaran For Respondents : Not Ready Notice [R1] No appearance [R2] Labour Court [R3]

¶21

¶22

ORDER

¶23

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the settlement in the manner known to law. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition.

¶24

2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for

¶25

the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedy in the manner known to law. No costs.

¶26

26.03.2025

¶27

Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No sp

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page No.2 of 4

W.P.No.17221 of 2018