Dismissed¶27

G.Dhanam v. The Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC7 Oct 2025WP/16774/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.16774 of 2023; G.Dhanam vs Inspector General of Registration, Deputy Inspector General of Registration Cuddalore, District Registrar Kallakurichi, Sub Registrar Sankarapuram, N.Selvarani; writ petition under Article 226; certiorari; registration department proceedings Na.Ka. No.5052/ U/ 2022 dated 24.04.2023; matter listed 'For Withdrawal'; counsel's endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Justice Krishnan Ramasamy; decision date 07.10.2025; no substantive legal issue decided; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs. ¶27

G.Dhanam Vs The Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.16774 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 07.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

W.P.No.16774 of 2023

¶7

G.Dhanam ... Petitioner

¶8

..Vs..

¶9

The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai-28

¶10

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Cuddalore-607 002.

¶11

3.The District Registrar (Administration) Kallakurichi.

¶12

4.The Sub Registrar, Sankarapuram, Kallakurichi District-606 401. 5.N.Selvarani

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to for the records of the 2nd

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.16774 of 2023

¶18

respondent pertaining to the proceedings in Na.Ka. No.5052/ U/ 2022

¶19

dated 24.04.2023 and quash the same.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Aswin Karthik

¶21

for M/s.PV Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.P.Harish (R1 to R4) Government Advocate Mr.R.Bharath Kumar(R5)

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This matter has been listed under the caption 'For Withdrawal'

¶24

based on the letter submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner also sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶25

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the

¶26

petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition is

¶27

dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶28

07.10.2025

¶29

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶30

arr