Disposed¶30

G.Umarani v. the Chief Educational Officer

Madras HC22 Jan 2025WP/1665/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.1665 of 2025; writ of mandamus; Article 226; G. Umarani v. Chief Educational Officer and District Educational Officer, Tirupattur; representation dated 19/10/2024; CEO order dated 29/10/2024 in Na.No.3815/A5/2024; direction to consider representation on merits within one month; disposed of without expressing opinion on merits; no costs; single judge Vivek Kumar Singh, J.; decided 22/1/2025.

What did the court decide?

Second respondent directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19/10/2024 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; no costs awarded. ¶30

G.Umarani Vs the Chief Educational Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Writ Petition No.1665 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 22/1/2025

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

¶6

Writ Petition No.1665 of 2025

G. Umarani

... Petitioner

The Chief Educational Officer Office of the CEO Tirupattur 635 601.

¶11

The District Educational Officer District Educational Office Tirupattur 635 601. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶13

praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation dated 19/10/2024 and to take action as per the order of the first respondent dated 29/10/2024 in Na.No.3815/A5/2024 within a stipulated time.

¶14

For petitioner ... Mr.Sam Jayaraj Houston for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For respondents ... Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar Additional Government Pleader O R D E R

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Page No:1/4

¶17

Writ Petition No.1665 of 2025

¶18

This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to

¶19

consider the petitioner's representation dated 19/10/2024 and to take action as per the order of the first respondent dated 29/10/2024 within a stipulated time.

¶20

Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶21

In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel appearing for either side, this petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶22

The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 19/10/2024, the first respondent had directed the second respondent, vide, letter dated 29/10/2024 to take action. Since the second respondent had not taken any action, the petitioner has come forward with the instant writ petition.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice if this Court issues a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19/10/2024 and pass orders on the same

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:2/4

¶25

Writ Petition No.1665 of 2025

¶26

within a particular time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶27

The learned Additional Government Pleader has no objection for the said order being passed and he fairly conceded that the petitioner's representation dated 19/10/2024 will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without expressing

¶29

any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19/10/2024 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30