Dismissed¶25

S.Kalyani v. The Joint Director

Madras HC3 Sept 2025WP/16627/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (Art. 226 certiorari) challenging teacher suspension order R.C.No.1164/A2/2022 dated 22.06.2022 issued by District Education Officer, Tiruchengode (Namakkal District); petitioner S.Kalyani; fourth respondent Secretary, S.P.B. Aided High School, Pallipalayam; suspension revoked during pendency; petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs; connected W.M.P.Nos.15911 & 15913 of 2022 closed; bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.; decided 03.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the petitioner's counsel's submission that the impugned suspension had been revoked, this Court held that the writ petition had been rendered infructuous and dismissed it for that reason without any order as to costs. ¶25

S.Kalyani Vs The Joint Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.09.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

W.P.No.16627 of 2022

¶6

and W.M.P.Nos.15911 & 15913 of 2022

¶7

S.Kalyani Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

1.The Joint Director, O/o. The Joint Director of School Education, Secondary Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai – 6.

¶10

2.The Chief Education Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Office, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶11

3.The District Education Officer, O/o. The District Educational Office, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶12

4.The Secretary, S.P.B. Aided High School, Pallipalayam, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. ... Respondents

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to

¶16

the impugned suspension order issued by the 3^rd respondent in his proceedings in R.C.No.1164/A2/2022 dated 22.06.2022 and quash the same as illegal.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.V.Perumal for R4 Ms.V.Yamunadevi, Spl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

An order of suspension was challenged in this writ petition. After the

¶22

writ petition was filed, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that such suspension was revoked.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

In view of this development, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed for such reasons without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶26

03.09.2025

¶27

rna

¶28

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No

¶29

¶30