Dismissed¶29

M.P.Lakshmi, v. State Rep by

Madras HC4 Mar 2025WP/15723/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.15723 of 2024; decided 04.03.2025 by G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.; petitioner M.P.Lakshmi sought mandamus for police protection citing complaint dated 23.05.2024 to Annadhanapatti Police Station, Salem, and injunction orders in O.S.No.709 of 2004 and A.S.No.102 of 2007; enquiry on complaint reported closed; writ petition dismissed, no costs.

What did the court decide?

In view of the enquiry conducted on the petitioner's complaint dated 23.05.2024 having been closed, the direction sought for in the writ petition cannot be considered. ¶27

M.P.Lakshmi, Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.15723 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 04.03.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.15723 of 2024

M.P.Lakshmi

... Petitioner

-Vs-

State Rep By

¶11

The Commissioner of Police, O/O. The Commissioner of Police,

¶12

Salem.

¶13

State Rep By,

¶14

The Inspector of Police, Annadhanapatti Police Station,

¶15

Salem District.

¶16

Chandran ...Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents police to provide adequate police protection to petitioner life and property on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 23.05.2024 given before the respondents 1 to 2 on the strength of the order of permanent injunction dated 14.11.2006 made in O.S.No.709 of 2004 by the Hon'ble Principal District Munsif Court, Salem as well as the Order in A.S.No.102 of 2007 passed by the Hon'ble Sub-court, Salem.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Viswanathan For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R3 : Mr.D.Shivakumaran

¶19

Page 1 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.No.15723 of 2024

¶22

O RDER

¶23

This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents police to provide adequate police protection to petitioner life and property on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 23.05.2024 given before the respondents 1 to 2.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶25

Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.

¶26

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 23.05.2024, the enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed.

¶27