A.Arivazhagan v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Anna University Assistant Professor recruitment Notification No.001/RC/UD-FR/PR 10 & 20/2020 – 1 dated 30.09.2020; Clause 2.E and Clause 4.1.C mandating Ph.D qualification (per counsel, with one-year post-Ph.D experience) as eligibility criterion; alleged conflict with UGC Regulations permitting NET/SLET/SET-qualified candidates without Ph.D; petitioner A.Arivazhagan, M.Sc Geology, SET-qualified, Department of Geology, Science and Humanities Branch; standing counsel: all 26 notified Assistant Professor posts filled; writ petition closed — nothing survived for adjudication; No costs; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Justice N. Mala; decided 16.07.2025; UGC; AICTE; Anna University Registrar.
What did the court decide?
After hearing both sides and perusing the materials, the Court found that nothing survived in the writ petition for further adjudication (following the standing counsel's statement that all 26 notified Assistant Professor posts had been filled), and accordingly closed the writ petition without adjudicating the merits of the impugned clauses, imposing no costs on the parties.