Dismissed¶25

T.Mani v. The Govt. of Tamilnadu

Madras HC7 Nov 2025WP/15125/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of a Madras High Court writ petition (WP No. 15125 of 2017, decided 07-11-2025 by K. Surender J.) for the petitioner-counsel's repeated failure to file Tamil translations of documents; the underlying claim was sanction of pension with arrears against the Government of Tamil Nadu, Greater Chennai Corporation and the Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, by way of certiorarified mandamus under Article 226 challenging letter Mu.Mu. No.A2/4330/2012 dated 5.12.2012; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition WMP.No.16391 of 2017 closed; no issues decided on merits and no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; writ petition dismissed without costs and the connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶25

T.Mani Vs The Govt. of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 15125 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07-11-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶6

WP No. 15125 of 2017 WMP.No.16391 of 2017

T.Mani

Petitioner(s)

The Govt. of Tamilnadu

¶11

rep. by the Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9

¶12

2.The commissioner

¶13

Greater Chennai Corporation, Park Town, Chennai-3

¶14

3.The Asst. Commissiner zone-7, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ambattur, Chennai-53

¶15

4.Deputy Director

¶16

Local Fund Audit, Greater Chennai Corporation Audit, Chennai-3

¶17

Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the files of the 4th respondent pertaining to his impugned letter bearing Mu.Mu. No.A2/ 4330/2012 dated 5.12.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct respondents 2 to 4 to sanction pension to the petitioner with arrears of pension within a time frame.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 15125 of 2017

¶20

For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Apunu

¶21

For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Veluchamy AGP for R1 and R4 R2 & R3-NA

¶22

ORDER

¶23

On 25.09.2025, though the learned counsel for the petitioner undertook to

¶24

file the translated copy of the documents in Tamil, he failed to file the translated documents on 30.10.2025. Hence, the matter was adjourned today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, the learned counsel failed to file the translated copy of the documents in Tamil.

¶25