Dismissed¶23

Vivek Chandrasekaran v. the Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC22 Aug 2025WP/14569/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no appearance by petitioner's counsel; Madras High Court; Justice N. Sathish Kumar; decided 22.08.2025; W.P.No.14569 of 2024; Vivek Chandrasekaran v. Regional Passport Officer, Passport Officer Trichirappalli, Chief Immigration Officer, SP Nagapattinam, Inspector of Police Vedaranyam and K.Sekar; prayer for mandamus under Article 226 regarding representation dated 07.11.2023 and alleged fake passport obtained by sixth respondent; no costs; no merits adjudication; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. ¶22

Vivek Chandrasekaran Vs the Regional Passport Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.14569 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.08.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.14569 of 2024

Vivek Chandrasekaran

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, No.283, Royala Towers, IV Floor, Old No.785, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶11

The Passport Officer, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar VII Cross, Trichirappalli – 620 018.

¶12

The Chief Immigration Officer, No.26, Shastri Bhavan Annex, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam Office of the Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam District.

¶14

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vedaranyam Police Station, Nagapattinam District.

¶15

K.Sekar ... Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.14569 of 2024

¶19

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, to direct respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2023 within the time frame fixed by this Court and consequently, direct respondents 2 and 4 to initiate action against the 6 th respondent herein for obtaining a fake passport.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gokulakrishnan (No Appearance) For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Karthikeyan, CGSPC For R4 and R5 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor For R6 : Mr.S.Bharathvaaj

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

When the matter was taken up for hearing today , there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶23