S.Jerald Arokiya Santhanam v. Tamil Nadu Handloom Weavers
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.No.13821 of 2025 (Madras HC, 09.09.2025, A.D.Jagadish Chandira J.) — writ of mandamus under Article 226; permission to engage advocate in departmental/disciplinary enquiry; Inquiry Officer is an advocate; Presenting Officer denied request of 22.03.2025; representation of 20.03.2025 unconsidered; petitioner S.Jerald Arokiya Santhanam; Tamil Nadu Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society; suspension 03.01.2022; charge memos 02.03.2022 (two charges) and 11.03.2022 (nine charges) without list of documents and witnesses; removal from service 25.06.2024 without enquiry; earlier writ W.P.No.19724 of 2024 and order dated 23.07.2024 for fresh enquiry; mutual right of both sides to counsel representation; enquiry to be completed expeditiously with hearing; disposed, no costs, WMP.Nos.15526 & 27701 of 2025 closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions: the Inquiry Officer (third respondent) to permit the petitioner to engage an advocate to defend his case; the first and second respondents likewise permitted to be represented by counsel; enquiry to be completed expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petitions (WMP.Nos.15526 & 27701 of 2025) closed.