Disposed¶28

Panneer Selvan v. the District Collector

Madras HC17 Apr 2025WP/13367/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court 2025 writ petition withdrawal: Panneer Selvan v District Collector Mayiladuthurai and Tahsildar Sirkazhi Taluk; Article 226 mandamus for inquiry and patta issuance, Tirunandriyur Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District; petition withdrawn after arguments with preservation of rights and contentions; W.M.P.No.14953 of 2025 closed; no costs; order by M. Sundar J. dated 17.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and WMP permitted to be withdrawn and closed, with all rights and contentions of the writ petitioner preserved to come back to the Court on the same subject matter if the need arises; no order as to costs. ¶28

Panneer Selvan Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P. No.13367 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶7

W.P. No.13367 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.14953 of 2025

Panneer Selvan

Petitioner

vs.

The District Collector Collectorate 609 Mayiladuthurai District 609 001

¶12

The Tahsildar Sirkazhi Taluk Mayiladuthurai District 609 001 Respondents

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to conduct an inquiry and issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property situated at Tirunandriyur Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District, within a time frame.

¶14

For petitioner Mr. K. Shahul Hameed

¶15

ORDER

¶16

[made by M. SUNDAR, J.]

¶17

After some arguments, Mr. K. Shahul Hameed, learned counsel

¶18

on record for the writ petitioner, sought leave of this Court to withdraw

¶19

Page Nos.1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P. No.13367 of 2025

¶22

the captioned main 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) and captioned 'writ miscellaneous petition' (hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity) thereat but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner to come back to this Court on the same subject matter, if the need arises. This request is acceded to. For this purpose, all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner are preserved.

¶23

A scanned reproduction of the endorsement made by learned counsel on record for writ petitioner in the case file is as follows:

¶24

Page Nos.2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P. No.13367 of 2025

¶27

In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned main WP

¶28

and captioned WMP thereat are disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

(M.S., J.) (K.G.T., J.) 17.04.2025

¶30

cad Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No

¶31

To:

¶32

The District Collector Collectorate 609 Mayiladuthurai District 609 001

¶33

The Tahsildar Sirkazhi Taluk Mayiladuthurai District 609 001

¶34

Page Nos.3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P. No.13367 of 2025

¶37

M.SUNDAR, J. and K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

¶38

cad

¶39

W.P. No.13367 of 2025

¶40

17.04.2025

¶41

Page Nos.4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Panneer Selvan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panneer Selvan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Kotteeswaran Vs The Tahsildar

Pannerselvam Vs the Commissioner

Kamalakannan Vs the District Collector

Pannerselvam C Vs the District Collector

Padhmanapan Vs the District Collector

Mr. P.Rajendran, Vs Thiru. K.Tharpagaraj, I.a.S., and 3 others