N.Selvaraj, v. Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court common order dated 12.03.2025 by Justice C. Saravanan dismissing W.P.Nos.1260 and 1261 of 2011 (petitioner N. Selvaraj; respondents include CISF Unit DAE (K) Kalpakkam officers and CISF Unit Neyveli Lignite Corporation officers) as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel's endorsement that nothing survived for adjudication. The Article 226 certiorarified mandamus petitions had challenged CISF disciplinary confirmation and revision orders of 2000-2010 (final orders dated 11.11.2009 and 08.11.2000; appellate orders dated 11.01.2010 and 22.02.2001; impugned orders dated 25.05.2010 and 22.07.2010) and sought pension revision from 03.07.2010. Dismissed without costs; no merits findings; no precedents cited. Advocates: A.S. Mujibur Rahman for the petitioner; Dr. D. Simon, Central Government Standing Counsel, for the respondents.
What did the court decide?
In view of the learned counsel for the petitioner's submission and endorsement that the writ petitions had become infructuous, nothing survived for adjudication, and both writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous, with no costs.