Disposed

A.Noorjahan v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC8 Apr 2025WP/12555/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking a direction to the Inspector General of Registration to dispose of an appeal filed in 2023 with a personal hearing to the petitioner. The court disposed of it by directing the petitioner to appear on 29.04.2025 and the first respondent to decide the appeal within twelve weeks thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to take up and decide the appeal within twelve weeks of petitioner's appearance on 29.04.2025.

A.Noorjahan Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

A.NOORJAHAN

... Petitioner

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION OFFICE, NO.100, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD,

¶11

CHENNAI - 18.

¶12

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, THE DISTRICT REGISTER OFFICE, VELLORE.

¶13

R. KALA, NOON MEAL ORGANISER, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ANANTHATHANDAVAPURAM, MAYLADUTHURAI DISTRICT.

¶14

A. MALARVIZHI, NOON MEAL ORGANISER, GOVERNEMNT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THIRUKOKARANAM, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to dispose of the Appeal dated 22.06.2023 filed before the respondents herein after considering all the materials sent with an Appeal and after giving an opportunity of the petitioner by giving personal hearing to the petitioner.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

¶19

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Mahalakshmi For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Sasikumar Government Advocate

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This writ petition is filed with a prayer to dispose of the appeal dated 22.06.2023 filed before the respondent herein after considering all the materials sent with the appeal.

¶22

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on written instructions, would submit that when the said appeal was taken up for consideration, the petitioner did not appear before the first respondent and even the communication sent was returned with an endorsement stating “no such person.”

¶23

In any event, since the appeal is said to have been filed, this writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:-

¶24

(i) The petitioner shall appear before the first respondent on 29.04.2025,

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

¶28

and the first respondent shall take up the appeal for consideration. After due

¶29

enquiry, orders shall be passed in the manner known to law.

¶30

(ii) The said exercise shall be completed within twelve weeks from the

¶31

date of the petitioner’s appearance before the first respondent.

¶32

(iii) The party shall act on the production of the web copy of the order

¶33

without waiting for the certified copy. No costs.

¶34

08.04.2025

¶35

Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsl

¶36

¶37

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION OFFICE, NO.100, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI - 18.

¶38

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, THE DISTRICT REGISTER OFFICE, VELLORE.

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

¶42

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

nsl

W.P.No.12555 of 2025

08.04.2025

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Noorjahan v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Noorjahan v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murali Radhakrishnan Vs the Regional Passport Officer

M.Madeswaran, Vs M.Kabir and Another

Santhoshkumar Babu Vs T.Prabhu Shankar, I.a.S., and Another

M.Chelliah Vs Union of India

P.Radhakrishnan Vs the Secretary

R.Gurusamy Vs the Chief Executive Officer