Allowed¶37

S.Kanakaraj and 3 Oths. v. the Govt of Tn Rep by Its

Madras HC17 Feb 2025WP/12313/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.12313 of 1996; decided 17.02.2025 by N. Anand Venkatesh, J; disposed as allowed. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 S.4(1) notification G.O.Ms.No.679 (Housing and Urban Development Dept., 18.04.1991) and S.6 declaration G.O.Ms.No.252 (19.05.1992); neighbourhood/housing scheme acquisition, Coimbatore; Tamil Nadu Housing Board suo motu impleaded as R3; batch W.P.No.12212 of 1994 etc. allowed by common order 03.03.2022 held to enure to these petitioners; writ of certiorari; no costs; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed in terms of the order passed in the batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12212/1994 etc. dated 03.03.2022; no costs. ¶37

S.Kanakaraj and 3 Oths. Vs the Govt of Tn Rep by Its — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.02.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

¶7

1.S.Kanakaraj 2.P.Ramasamy 3.Rajalakshmi 4.M.Subbanna Gounder .... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Housing and Urban Development Department Fort St.George Madras - 9.

¶10

2.The Land Acquisition Officer and Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Housing Scheme Unit I, Coimbatore.

¶11

3.The Tamil Nadu Housing Board Coimbatore Housing Unit Peelamedu, Coimbatore. .... Respondents

¶12

[R3 suo motu impleaded vide order of this Court dated 17.02.2025]

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/6

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

Prayer :

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent relating to the notifications made under Sec.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in G.O. Ms.No.679, Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 18.04.1991, and the subsequent declaration made under Section 6 in G.O.Ms.No.252, Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 19.05.1992 and quash the same insofar as the petitioner's lands are concerned, and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Muthukumaraswami

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader [R1 &R2]

¶20

Mr.V.Gunasekar Standing Counsel for R3

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Coimbatore Housing Unit, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, is suo motu impleaded as third respondent in this writ petition. Mr.V.Gunasekar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the impleaded third respondent.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/6

¶25

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

¶26

2.This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings / notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.679, Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 18.04.1991 and also the subsequent declaration issued under Section 6 of the Act, dated 19.05.1992.

¶27

When the matter came up for hearing on 10.02.2025, this Court passed the following order :

¶28

"There is no appearance on the side of the petitioners.

¶29

2. An earlier order was passed by this Court on 09.7.2003 wherein it has been mentioned that this writ petition pertains to acquisition for neighborhood scheme and that the same issue was raised in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12212 of 1994 etc. cases and hence, this writ petition was directed to be posted along the said batch of cases. Unfortunately, this writ petition was left out from that batch. The said batch of cases was allowed by a common order dated 03.3.2022.

¶30

3.In view of the above, the learned Additional Government Pleader shall get instructions as to whether the common order passed in the said batch of cases will enure in favour of the petitioners.

¶31

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader seeks for time. Post on 17.2.2025 finally. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be granted in this case."

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/6

¶34

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

¶35

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Standing

¶36

Counsel appearing on behalf of the Housing Board submitted that as against the order passed in the batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12212/1994 etc., no appeal has been preferred by the Housing Board.

¶37

In the light of the above submissions, the order that was passed by this Court in the batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12212/1994 etc. will enure in favour of the petitioners also and hence, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12212/1994 etc. dated 03.03.2022. No costs.

¶38

17.02.2025

¶39

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral citation : Yes/No ds

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/6

¶42

W.P.No.12313 of 1996

¶43

To: