Dismissed¶26

The Sub Registrar - 1 v. N.Balamurugan

Madras HC20 Mar 2025WMP(MD)/4103/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, N. Sathish Kumar J., order dated 20.03.2025 in WMP(MD) No.4103 of 2025 & Rev.Aplw(MD) SR No.16903 of 2025 (Sub Registrar-I, Dindigul District v. N. Balamurugan & others): condonation of 150 days' delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act and review under Article 226 of order dated 28.08.2024 in W.P.(MD) No.16951 of 2019 setting aside refusal slip and directing registration; held no apparent error on face of record and review application not maintainable; petition dismissed, no costs, Review Application rejected; counsel: S. Vinodh, Government Advocate for petitioner; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

This Court having clearly passed an order setting aside the refusal slip and directing registration of the document, the Sub Registrar was bound to comply with that order. ¶26

The Sub Registrar - 1 Vs N.Balamurugan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WMP(MD) No.4103 of 2025 & Rev.Aplw(MD) SR No.16903 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 20.03.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

WMP(MD) No.4103 of 2025

¶7

¶8

Rev.Aplw(MD) SR No.16903 of 2025

¶9

The Sub Registrar - I, Registrar Office, Dindigul District. ... Petitioner in both WMP &

¶10

Rev.Aplw

¶11

Vs.

¶12

N.Balamurugan,

¶13

The District Registrar, Registrar Office, Dindigul.

¶14

Mallika, Sub Registrar – 1, Registrar office, Dindigul District. ..Respondents in both WMP & Rev. Aplw

¶15

Common Prayer : Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 150 days in filing the above review application and under Article 226 of Constitution of India to review the Order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.16951 of 2019 dated 28.08.2024.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WMP(MD) No.4103 of 2025 & Rev.Aplw(MD) SR No.16903 of 2025

¶20

in both WMP and Rev.Aplw

¶21

COMMON ORDER

¶22

These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 150 days in filing

¶23

the review application and to review the Order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No. 16951 of 2019 dated 28.08.2024.

¶24

The main Review Application has been filed by the Sub Registrar on the

¶25

ground that certain particulars have not been brought to his notice.

¶26

When this Court has clearly passed an Order by setting aside the refusal slip and directed to register the document, the Sub Registrar has to comply the Order. On a perusal of the grounds in the review application, there is no apparent error on the face of the record. As the very review application itself is not maintainable, this petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the Review Application is rejected.

20.03.2025

vrc

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

WMP(MD) No.4103 of 2025 & Rev.Aplw(MD) SR No.16903 of 2025

¶32

¶33