Dismissed

The Director of Elementary School Education v. Mary

Madras HC4 Apr 2025WMP(MD)/3807/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The government advocate stated that nothing survives in the review applications and requested closure of the condonation of delay petitions. The court closed the miscellaneous petitions and rejected the review applications at the special recognition stage, with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Review applications rejected; condonation petitions closed.

The Director of Elementary School Education Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.M.P.(MD)No.3807 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3807, 3813, 3830, 3834, 3838, 3840 and 4606 of 2025 in

¶7

Rev.Aplw.(MD)SR.Nos.10369, 10365, 10370, 10368, 10366, 10367 and 19423 of 2025

¶8

W.M.P.(MD)No.3807 of 2025

¶9

1.The Director of Elementary School Education, D.P.I.Compound, College Road, Chennai.

¶10

2.The District Educational Officer, (Elementary), Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶11

3.The Block Educational Officer, Kuruvikulam Range, Tenkasi District.

¶12

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

5.The Chief Educational Officer, Tenkasi District.

¶14

... Petitioners / Review Petitioners

¶15

.Vs.

¶16

1.Mary

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.M.P.(MD)No.3807 of 2025

¶20

2.The Correspondent, TDTA Middle School, Sayamalai, Tenkasi District.

¶21

... Respondents / Respondents

¶22

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 116 days in filing the above review application filed as against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.25283 of 2023 dated 11.09.2024, on the file of this Court.

¶23

In all Miscellaneous Petitions:

¶24

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Amjad Khan, Government Advocate For R-1 : Mr.S.Chellapandian

¶25

ORDER

¶26

When the matter was taken up hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that nothing survives in these review applications and the condone delay petitions may be closed.

¶27

2.Recording the same, these Miscellaneous Petitions are closed and the Review Applications are rejected in the SR stage itself. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

04.04.2025

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶30

2/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.M.P.(MD)No.3807 of 2025

¶33

¶34

1.The Director of Elementary School Education, D.P.I.Compound, College Road, Chennai.

¶35

2.The District Educational Officer, (Elementary), Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶36

3.The Block Educational Officer, Kuruvikulam Range, Tenkasi District.

¶37

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District.

¶38

5.The Chief Educational Officer, Tenkasi District.

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.M.P.(MD)No.3807 of 2025

¶42

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶43

Sml

¶44

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3807, 3813, 3830, 3834, 3838, 3840 and 4606 of 2025

¶45

¶46

Rev.Aplw.(MD)SR.Nos.10369, 10365, 10370, 10368, 10366, 10367 and 19423 of 2025

¶47

04.04.2025

¶48

4/4

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Director of Elementary School Education v. Mary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director of Elementary School Education v. Mary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Periyasamy Vs v.Vignesh Kumar

M/s.Oriental Insurance Company limited Vs v.Vijayalakshmi

Sethupathi Vs The General Manager

The Branch Manager, Vs Amulraj

The Managing Director Vs Jayaseelan (Died), 1.Jesuraj

The New Inda Assucance Company Ltd. Vs G.Palaneeswari